aifree.dev

Why do AI test scores look better than it feels?

Benchmarks: a public test score can include recall of questions leaked into training, stops separating models near the top, and is measured on tasks that are not yours · Beginner · 5 min · llm, training · after Evals: a fixed question set, a grader and several runs

A benchmark score is one number from a public test. Its questions can leak into training data, top models crowd near the ceiling, and its tasks are not yours. Try a few of your own real tasks instead.

Before you start: could you explain this to a friend?

1 = not at all · 5 = easily

  1. 1 Guess first

    A famous maths test for AI, GSM8k, is public online. Researchers wrote 1,205 new problems in the same style and difficulty and never published them. How did models score on the fresh ones?
  2. 2 Look

    What a test score leaves out

    1 / 4

    Right answers: public test vs fresh look-alikes

    GPT-4

    public91.1%
    fresh92.3%

    math-shepherd-mistral-7b-rl

    public82.6%
    fresh75.4%

    phi-2

    public56.6%
    fresh50.4%

    Yi-6B-Chat

    public43.7%
    fresh35.7%

    GSM8k vs 1,205 fresh GSM1k problems (Zhang et al., 2024)

    A public maths test against 1,205 fresh look-alikes nobody had published. GPT-4 held; some models fell up to 8 points, as if they had partly learned the public test.

    A score is one number from one public test: part of it can be memory of leaked questions, near the top it stops separating models, and none of it is your task.

  3. Benchmarks are published so anyone can compare models. That also puts their questions and answers on the web, and web text is training data. A model that has read a question with its answer can score by recall, not skill. Labs try to filter tests out, but the score alone cannot tell you how well.

  4. 4 You are the model

    You are the model. Meet three requests: a test question you saw in training, a fresh look-alike, and a real task no test covers.

    round 1 of 3 · This exact test question, with its answer, was on many web pages you trained on.

    The question comes in. What do you most likely do?

    GSM8k vs 1,205 fresh GSM1k problems (Zhang et al., 2024); wording illustrative

    You are the model. Pick what most likely happens.
  5. 5 Check

    In the picture, what happened to GPT-4 on the fresh maths problems?
  6. Old tests also fill up. Top models score over 90% on MMLU, so a point between them says little. A harder test, Humanity’s Last Exam, spread the same kind of models out again, from 2.7% to 13.4%. On Chatbot Arena, where people vote, the top two models sat 0.7% apart.

  7. And a benchmark is not your job. Exam questions and maths puzzles say little about your emails, your code or your language. So use scores to shortlist, then give two or three models a few of your own real tasks and judge the replies yourself. The evals lesson shows how to make that fair.

  8. 8 Say it back

  9. 9 Mission · 5 min

    Pick two real tasks from your week, such as an email to rewrite and a page to summarise. In OpenRouter’s chat room, add two free models and send each task to both. Mark every reply: usable, needs edits, or wrong. Which model won on your tasks, and is it the one with the higher benchmark score?

Three quick ones

Drawn at random from this lesson's pool; different next time.

Done?

Now: could you explain this to a friend?

1 = not at all · 5 = easily

Answer the three quick ones first.

Get an email when new lessons come out

New lessons arrive in the weekly digest, only in a week that has one. You confirm by email first; unsubscribe in one click.

Sources

  • Zhang, Da, Lee, Robinson, Wu, Song, Zhao, Raja, Slack, Lyu, Hendryx, Kaplan, Lunati, Yue, “A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic” (arXiv:2405.00332, v4 2024-11-22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00332, checked 2026-10-23): GSM1k, “1205 problems” written to mirror GSM8k’s style and difficulty; “we observe accuracy drops of up to 8%” (v1 of 2024-05-01 said up to 13%; v4 is used); “all frontier models show minimal signs of overfitting”; Table 1 (standard prompt), GSM8k vs GSM1k: gpt-4 0.911 vs 0.923, math-shepherd-mistral-7b-rl 0.826 vs 0.754, phi-2 0.566 vs 0.504, Yi-6B-Chat 0.437 vs 0.357
  • Phan et al., “Humanity’s Last Exam” (arXiv:2501.14249, v12 2026-10-19, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14249, checked 2026-10-23): “LLMs now achieve over 90% accuracy on popular benchmarks like MMLU”; 2,500 questions; Table 1 HLE accuracy GPT-4o 2.7%, Claude 3.5 Sonnet 4.1%, o1 8.0%, o3-mini (high) 13.4% (text-only subset)
  • Stanford HAI, AI Index Report 2025 (https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report, checked 2026-10-23): on Chatbot Arena the score gap between the top and 10th-ranked models “fell from 11.9% to 5.4% in a year”; “the top two are now separated by just 0.7%”
  • Model A and Model B in the picture, their scores, the role wording, the customer-email and record examples and the mission tasks are illustrative, not measured
  • aifree.dev catalog, openrouter-free-models (verified 2026-10-12, read-only API check 2026-10-23): OpenRouter free model variants, 20 requests/minute, 50/day without bought credits

Published Oct 23, 2026 · updated Oct 23, 2026

Embed this

Paste this into a blog post or course page: the lesson's main picture in an iframe, with a link back to the full lesson.

<iframe src="https://aifree.dev/embed/explain/benchmarks" width="100%" height="620" style="border:0;max-width:720px" title="Why do AI test scores look better than it feels? (aifree.dev Explain)" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p><a href="https://aifree.dev/explain/benchmarks">Why do AI test scores look better than it feels? Interactive lesson on aifree.dev</a></p>

Never miss new offers and news

New tools, credits, and AI news are added regularly. Pick how you want to hear about them.

Telegram channel
Join @aifree_dev and get new free AI offers and news right in your Telegram feed.
Browser notifications
Turn on push notifications and get an alert on this device whenever something new is posted. No account needed.
Email newsletter
A weekly digest of new, changed and expiring free AI offers. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe. See the latest issue.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy

Frequently asked questions

What is aifree.dev?

aifree.dev helps everyone access AI through a curated directory of free AI tools, API credits, free tiers, and startup programs for coding, image, voice, video, and students - verified regularly.

How are offers presented?

Each offer includes its access details, free models when available, and expiration information when provided. Limited-time deals stay visible so they are easy to compare.

Do education and startup programs need verification?

Yes. Providers usually ask students to verify their status with a school email, student ID, or a program like the GitHub Student Pack, and ask startups to verify company details such as age, funding, or website. Check each offer’s claim page for the exact requirements.

What kinds of free AI offers are listed?

Free tiers and free trials from AI providers, free API credits, startup and student programs, and free tools for coding, image generation, voice, and video.

How can I suggest a tool or report a broken link?

Use the submit form: paste the offer page URL and a short note. A person checks every submission before anything is listed. Broken links and changed terms go through the same form.

+

Know a good one?

Tell us about an AI tool worth knowing. Found a broken link? We want to hear that too.

Submit an offer