aifree.dev

Why won't it just say 'I don't know'?

Why chatbots guess instead of saying “I don’t know”: training and most benchmarks score a right answer 1 and both a wrong answer and “I don’t know” 0, like a multiple-choice exam with no penalty, so guessing never scores less than passing and the model learns to answer confidently; a stated penalty for wrong answers flips the choice for unsure answers; in your own chat, allow “I don’t know” explicitly, ask how sure it is (models tend to overstate it) and ask for a source you can open · Beginner · 5 min · safety, training, llm · after Hallucination, Benchmarks: a public test score can include recall of questions leaked into training, stops separating models near the top, and is measured on tasks that are not yours

Chatbots rarely say “I don’t know” because training and tests score it 0, the same as a wrong answer, while a guess can score 1. So they learn to sound sure. Allow it, ask how sure, ask for sources.

Before you start: could you explain this to a friend?

1 = not at all · 5 = easily

  1. 1 Guess first

    On SimpleQA, a test of 4,326 short fact questions, OpenAI o4-mini got 24% right and gpt-5-thinking-mini got 22% right. On what share of all the questions was o4-mini wrong?
  2. 2 Look

    How the test is scored, and what the model learns

    1 / 6

    How most tests score an answer

    Right answer1
    Wrong answer0
    “I don’t know”0

    Not sure? What each choice is worth on average

    Guess one of 4 options0.25
    Say “I don’t know”0.00

    binary 0-1 scoring as described in Kalai et al., arXiv:2509.04664 (2025), §1; the average is arithmetic

    Most tests score a model like a multiple-choice exam with no penalty: right is 1 point, wrong is 0, and “I don’t know” is also 0. A blind guess between four options is worth 0.25 on average. Saying “I don’t know” is worth nothing.

    When “I don’t know” scores the same 0 as a wrong answer, a guess is never worse and sometimes better. Models are scored that way, so they learn to answer anyway, and to sound sure.

  3. Think of a multiple-choice exam with no penalty. A blank scores 0, a wrong answer scores 0, and a guess sometimes scores 1. The student who always guesses beats the one who leaves blanks. Models are trained and ranked the same way, so they learn the student’s trick: always answer, and say it like you mean it.

  4. 4 You are the model

    You are the model taking a test. Three questions: each time you see the scoring rules and how sure you are. Answer, or say “I don’t know”?

    Round 1 of 3. Scoring: Right 1 point, wrong 0, “I don’t know” 0.

    In what year was a small-town library founded? You are 30% sure of your best answer.

    illustrative: the questions and how sure you are are ours

    You are the model taking the test. Answer, or pass?
  5. 5 Check

    In the picture, the prompt asked for a birthday “if you know”. What did DeepSeek-V3 do?
  6. It is not one odd test. Kalai et al. (2025) checked 10 popular benchmarks: 9 give no credit at all for “I don’t know”. On SimpleQA, GPT-4o passed on 1.0% of questions and was wrong on 60.8%; Claude 3.5 Sonnet passed on 35.0% and was wrong on 36.1%. Fewer passes, more wrong answers.

  7. You can change the rules in your own chat. Say it plainly: “If you are not sure, say I don’t know; a wrong answer is worse than none.” Ask how sure it is, but treat a high number with care: on SimpleQA, models consistently overstated their confidence. And ask for a source, then open it.

  8. 8 Say it back

  9. 9 Mission · 5 min

    In ChatGPT Free, ask three questions you know the answer to but that are hard to look up, such as the year your school or a small local shop opened. Count the answers that sound sure but are wrong. Then in a new chat start with: “If you are not sure, say ‘I don’t know’. A wrong answer is worse than none. After each answer, give your confidence from 0 to 100% and a source.” Ask the same three. What changed?

Three quick ones

Drawn at random from this lesson's pool; different next time.

Done?

Now: could you explain this to a friend?

1 = not at all · 5 = easily

Answer the three quick ones first.

Get an email when new lessons come out

New lessons arrive in the weekly digest, only in a week that has one. You confirm by email first; unsubscribe in one click.

Sources

  • The role’s questions, how sure the reader is in each round, and the “guess between four options” average are illustrative, written for this lesson on 2026-10-24; the averages are arithmetic (right × 1 − wrong × penalty)
  • Kalai, Nachum, Vempala and Zhang, “Why Language Models Hallucinate” (arXiv:2509.04664 v1, 2025-09-04, https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04664, checked 2026-10-24): §1 prompt “What is Adam Tauman Kalai’s birthday? If you know, just respond with DD-MM.”; DeepSeek-V3 via the DeepSeek app on 11 May 2025 output “03-07”, “15-06” and “01-01”; “The correct date is in Autumn.”; guessing maximises the expected score “under a binary 0-1 scheme that awards 1 point for a correct answer and none for blanks or IDKs”. Table 2, IDK credit: GPQA, MMLU-Pro, IFEval, Omni-MATH, BBH, MATH (L5 split), MuSR, SWE-bench, HLE None; WildBench Partial (its 1-10 rubric “suggests that IDK may score lower than fair responses with hallucination”). §4.2 confidence targets: “Answer only if you are > t confident, since mistakes are penalized t/(1−t) points”, t = 0.5 (penalty 1) and t = 0.9 (penalty 9); the paper also lists t = 0.75 as “penalty 2”, which its own formula makes 3, so the lesson leaves it out
  • OpenAI, GPT-5 System Card (2025-08-13, https://cdn.openai.com/gpt-5-system-card.pdf, checked 2026-10-24): Table 8, SimpleQA (no web): accuracy gpt-5-thinking-mini 0.22, OpenAI o4-mini 0.24; hallucination rate gpt-5-thinking-mini 0.26, OpenAI o4-mini 0.75. “I don’t know” is shown as the rest, 1 − accuracy − hallucination rate: 0.52 and 0.01
  • Wei et al., “Measuring short-form factuality in large language models” (SimpleQA; arXiv:2411.04368 v1, 2024-11-07, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04368, checked 2026-10-24): 4,326 questions graded correct, incorrect or not attempted. Table 3 (correct / not attempted / incorrect, %): GPT-4o 38.2 / 1.0 / 60.8; Claude-3.5-sonnet (2024-06-20) 28.9 / 35.0 / 36.1. §4: stated confidence correlates with accuracy, but “models consistently overstate their confidence”
  • aifree.dev catalog, chatgpt-free (verified 2026-10-12, live check 2026-10-24): ChatGPT Free Plan
  • Worked examples in the text (illustrative, as above): a 30% chance of being right under a penalty of 1 for a wrong answer scores 0.30 − 0.70 = −0.40; the chatbot that says it is 95% sure is an example of a stated confidence, which SimpleQA §4 finds overstated

Published Oct 24, 2026 · updated Oct 26, 2026

Embed this

Paste this into a blog post or course page: the lesson's main picture in an iframe, with a link back to the full lesson.

<iframe src="https://aifree.dev/embed/explain/i-dont-know" width="100%" height="620" style="border:0;max-width:720px" title="Why won't it just say 'I don't know'? (aifree.dev Explain)" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p><a href="https://aifree.dev/explain/i-dont-know">Why won't it just say 'I don't know'? Interactive lesson on aifree.dev</a></p>

Never miss new offers and news

New tools, credits, and AI news are added regularly. Pick how you want to hear about them.

Telegram channel
Join @aifree_dev and get new free AI offers and news right in your Telegram feed.
Browser notifications
Turn on push notifications and get an alert on this device whenever something new is posted. No account needed.
Email newsletter
A weekly digest of new, changed and expiring free AI offers. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe. See the latest issue.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy

Frequently asked questions

What is aifree.dev?

aifree.dev helps everyone access AI through a curated directory of free AI tools, API credits, free tiers, and startup programs for coding, image, voice, video, and students - verified regularly.

How are offers presented?

Each offer includes its access details, free models when available, and expiration information when provided. Limited-time deals stay visible so they are easy to compare.

Do education and startup programs need verification?

Yes. Providers usually ask students to verify their status with a school email, student ID, or a program like the GitHub Student Pack, and ask startups to verify company details such as age, funding, or website. Check each offer’s claim page for the exact requirements.

What kinds of free AI offers are listed?

Free tiers and free trials from AI providers, free API credits, startup and student programs, and free tools for coding, image generation, voice, and video.

How can I suggest a tool or report a broken link?

Use the submit form: paste the offer page URL and a short note. A person checks every submission before anything is listed. Broken links and changed terms go through the same form.

+

Know a good one?

Tell us about an AI tool worth knowing. Found a broken link? We want to hear that too.

Submit an offer